i forgor to go mod vendor

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/README.md

@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
 [![Go Reference](https://pkg.go.dev/badge/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2.svg)](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2)
 [![Test](https://github.com/cespare/xxhash/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/cespare/xxhash/actions/workflows/test.yml)
 
-xxhash is a Go implementation of the 64-bit
-[xxHash](http://cyan4973.github.io/xxHash/) algorithm, XXH64. This is a
+xxhash is a Go implementation of the 64-bit [xxHash] algorithm, XXH64. This is a
 high-quality hashing algorithm that is much faster than anything in the Go
 standard library.
 
@@ -25,8 +24,11 @@ func (*Digest) WriteString(string) (int, error)
 func (*Digest) Sum64() uint64
 ```
 
-This implementation provides a fast pure-Go implementation and an even faster
-assembly implementation for amd64.
+The package is written with optimized pure Go and also contains even faster
+assembly implementations for amd64 and arm64. If desired, the `purego` build tag
+opts into using the Go code even on those architectures.
+
+[xxHash]: http://cyan4973.github.io/xxHash/
 
 ## Compatibility
 
@@ -45,19 +47,20 @@ I recommend using the latest release of Go.
 Here are some quick benchmarks comparing the pure-Go and assembly
 implementations of Sum64.
 
-| input size | purego | asm |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| 5 B   |  979.66 MB/s |  1291.17 MB/s  |
-| 100 B | 7475.26 MB/s | 7973.40 MB/s  |
-| 4 KB  | 17573.46 MB/s | 17602.65 MB/s |
-| 10 MB | 17131.46 MB/s | 17142.16 MB/s |
+| input size | purego    | asm       |
+| ---------- | --------- | --------- |
+| 4 B        |  1.3 GB/s |  1.2 GB/s |
+| 16 B       |  2.9 GB/s |  3.5 GB/s |
+| 100 B      |  6.9 GB/s |  8.1 GB/s |
+| 4 KB       | 11.7 GB/s | 16.7 GB/s |
+| 10 MB      | 12.0 GB/s | 17.3 GB/s |
 
-These numbers were generated on Ubuntu 18.04 with an Intel i7-8700K CPU using
-the following commands under Go 1.11.2:
+These numbers were generated on Ubuntu 20.04 with an Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C
+CPU using the following commands under Go 1.19.2:
 
 ```
-$ go test -tags purego -benchtime 10s -bench '/xxhash,direct,bytes'
-$ go test -benchtime 10s -bench '/xxhash,direct,bytes'
+benchstat <(go test -tags purego -benchtime 500ms -count 15 -bench 'Sum64$')
+benchstat <(go test -benchtime 500ms -count 15 -bench 'Sum64$')
 ```
 
 ## Projects using this package

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/testall.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+set -eu -o pipefail
+
+# Small convenience script for running the tests with various combinations of
+# arch/tags. This assumes we're running on amd64 and have qemu available.
+
+go test ./...
+go test -tags purego ./...
+GOARCH=arm64 go test
+GOARCH=arm64 go test -tags purego

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash.go

@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ const (
 	prime5 uint64 = 2870177450012600261
 )
 
-// NOTE(caleb): I'm using both consts and vars of the primes. Using consts where
-// possible in the Go code is worth a small (but measurable) performance boost
-// by avoiding some MOVQs. Vars are needed for the asm and also are useful for
-// convenience in the Go code in a few places where we need to intentionally
-// avoid constant arithmetic (e.g., v1 := prime1 + prime2 fails because the
-// result overflows a uint64).
-var (
-	prime1v = prime1
-	prime2v = prime2
-	prime3v = prime3
-	prime4v = prime4
-	prime5v = prime5
-)
+// Store the primes in an array as well.
+//
+// The consts are used when possible in Go code to avoid MOVs but we need a
+// contiguous array of the assembly code.
+var primes = [...]uint64{prime1, prime2, prime3, prime4, prime5}
 
 // Digest implements hash.Hash64.
 type Digest struct {
@@ -50,10 +42,10 @@ func New() *Digest {
 
 // Reset clears the Digest's state so that it can be reused.
 func (d *Digest) Reset() {
-	d.v1 = prime1v + prime2
+	d.v1 = primes[0] + prime2
 	d.v2 = prime2
 	d.v3 = 0
-	d.v4 = -prime1v
+	d.v4 = -primes[0]
 	d.total = 0
 	d.n = 0
 }
@@ -69,21 +61,23 @@ func (d *Digest) Write(b []byte) (n int, err error) {
 	n = len(b)
 	d.total += uint64(n)
 
+	memleft := d.mem[d.n&(len(d.mem)-1):]
+
 	if d.n+n < 32 {
 		// This new data doesn't even fill the current block.
-		copy(d.mem[d.n:], b)
+		copy(memleft, b)
 		d.n += n
 		return
 	}
 
 	if d.n > 0 {
 		// Finish off the partial block.
-		copy(d.mem[d.n:], b)
+		c := copy(memleft, b)
 		d.v1 = round(d.v1, u64(d.mem[0:8]))
 		d.v2 = round(d.v2, u64(d.mem[8:16]))
 		d.v3 = round(d.v3, u64(d.mem[16:24]))
 		d.v4 = round(d.v4, u64(d.mem[24:32]))
-		b = b[32-d.n:]
+		b = b[c:]
 		d.n = 0
 	}
 
@@ -133,21 +127,20 @@ func (d *Digest) Sum64() uint64 {
 
 	h += d.total
 
-	i, end := 0, d.n
-	for ; i+8 <= end; i += 8 {
-		k1 := round(0, u64(d.mem[i:i+8]))
+	b := d.mem[:d.n&(len(d.mem)-1)]
+	for ; len(b) >= 8; b = b[8:] {
+		k1 := round(0, u64(b[:8]))
 		h ^= k1
 		h = rol27(h)*prime1 + prime4
 	}
-	if i+4 <= end {
-		h ^= uint64(u32(d.mem[i:i+4])) * prime1
+	if len(b) >= 4 {
+		h ^= uint64(u32(b[:4])) * prime1
 		h = rol23(h)*prime2 + prime3
-		i += 4
+		b = b[4:]
 	}
-	for i < end {
-		h ^= uint64(d.mem[i]) * prime5
+	for ; len(b) > 0; b = b[1:] {
+		h ^= uint64(b[0]) * prime5
 		h = rol11(h) * prime1
-		i++
 	}
 
 	h ^= h >> 33

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_amd64.s

@@ -1,215 +1,209 @@
+//go:build !appengine && gc && !purego
 // +build !appengine
 // +build gc
 // +build !purego
 
 #include "textflag.h"
 
-// Register allocation:
-// AX	h
-// SI	pointer to advance through b
-// DX	n
-// BX	loop end
-// R8	v1, k1
-// R9	v2
-// R10	v3
-// R11	v4
-// R12	tmp
-// R13	prime1v
-// R14	prime2v
-// DI	prime4v
-
-// round reads from and advances the buffer pointer in SI.
-// It assumes that R13 has prime1v and R14 has prime2v.
-#define round(r) \
-	MOVQ  (SI), R12 \
-	ADDQ  $8, SI    \
-	IMULQ R14, R12  \
-	ADDQ  R12, r    \
-	ROLQ  $31, r    \
-	IMULQ R13, r
-
-// mergeRound applies a merge round on the two registers acc and val.
-// It assumes that R13 has prime1v, R14 has prime2v, and DI has prime4v.
-#define mergeRound(acc, val) \
-	IMULQ R14, val \
-	ROLQ  $31, val \
-	IMULQ R13, val \
-	XORQ  val, acc \
-	IMULQ R13, acc \
-	ADDQ  DI, acc
+// Registers:
+#define h      AX
+#define d      AX
+#define p      SI // pointer to advance through b
+#define n      DX
+#define end    BX // loop end
+#define v1     R8
+#define v2     R9
+#define v3     R10
+#define v4     R11
+#define x      R12
+#define prime1 R13
+#define prime2 R14
+#define prime4 DI
+
+#define round(acc, x) \
+	IMULQ prime2, x   \
+	ADDQ  x, acc      \
+	ROLQ  $31, acc    \
+	IMULQ prime1, acc
+
+// round0 performs the operation x = round(0, x).
+#define round0(x) \
+	IMULQ prime2, x \
+	ROLQ  $31, x    \
+	IMULQ prime1, x
+
+// mergeRound applies a merge round on the two registers acc and x.
+// It assumes that prime1, prime2, and prime4 have been loaded.
+#define mergeRound(acc, x) \
+	round0(x)         \
+	XORQ  x, acc      \
+	IMULQ prime1, acc \
+	ADDQ  prime4, acc
+
+// blockLoop processes as many 32-byte blocks as possible,
+// updating v1, v2, v3, and v4. It assumes that there is at least one block
+// to process.
+#define blockLoop() \
+loop:  \
+	MOVQ +0(p), x  \
+	round(v1, x)   \
+	MOVQ +8(p), x  \
+	round(v2, x)   \
+	MOVQ +16(p), x \
+	round(v3, x)   \
+	MOVQ +24(p), x \
+	round(v4, x)   \
+	ADDQ $32, p    \
+	CMPQ p, end    \
+	JLE  loop
 
 // func Sum64(b []byte) uint64
-TEXT ·Sum64(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-32
+TEXT ·Sum64(SB), NOSPLIT|NOFRAME, $0-32
 	// Load fixed primes.
-	MOVQ ·prime1v(SB), R13
-	MOVQ ·prime2v(SB), R14
-	MOVQ ·prime4v(SB), DI
+	MOVQ ·primes+0(SB), prime1
+	MOVQ ·primes+8(SB), prime2
+	MOVQ ·primes+24(SB), prime4
 
 	// Load slice.
-	MOVQ b_base+0(FP), SI
-	MOVQ b_len+8(FP), DX
-	LEAQ (SI)(DX*1), BX
+	MOVQ b_base+0(FP), p
+	MOVQ b_len+8(FP), n
+	LEAQ (p)(n*1), end
 
 	// The first loop limit will be len(b)-32.
-	SUBQ $32, BX
+	SUBQ $32, end
 
 	// Check whether we have at least one block.
-	CMPQ DX, $32
+	CMPQ n, $32
 	JLT  noBlocks
 
 	// Set up initial state (v1, v2, v3, v4).
-	MOVQ R13, R8
-	ADDQ R14, R8
-	MOVQ R14, R9
-	XORQ R10, R10
-	XORQ R11, R11
-	SUBQ R13, R11
-
-	// Loop until SI > BX.
-blockLoop:
-	round(R8)
-	round(R9)
-	round(R10)
-	round(R11)
-
-	CMPQ SI, BX
-	JLE  blockLoop
-
-	MOVQ R8, AX
-	ROLQ $1, AX
-	MOVQ R9, R12
-	ROLQ $7, R12
-	ADDQ R12, AX
-	MOVQ R10, R12
-	ROLQ $12, R12
-	ADDQ R12, AX
-	MOVQ R11, R12
-	ROLQ $18, R12
-	ADDQ R12, AX
-
-	mergeRound(AX, R8)
-	mergeRound(AX, R9)
-	mergeRound(AX, R10)
-	mergeRound(AX, R11)
+	MOVQ prime1, v1
+	ADDQ prime2, v1
+	MOVQ prime2, v2
+	XORQ v3, v3
+	XORQ v4, v4
+	SUBQ prime1, v4
+
+	blockLoop()
+
+	MOVQ v1, h
+	ROLQ $1, h
+	MOVQ v2, x
+	ROLQ $7, x
+	ADDQ x, h
+	MOVQ v3, x
+	ROLQ $12, x
+	ADDQ x, h
+	MOVQ v4, x
+	ROLQ $18, x
+	ADDQ x, h
+
+	mergeRound(h, v1)
+	mergeRound(h, v2)
+	mergeRound(h, v3)
+	mergeRound(h, v4)
 
 	JMP afterBlocks
 
 noBlocks:
-	MOVQ ·prime5v(SB), AX
+	MOVQ ·primes+32(SB), h
 
 afterBlocks:
-	ADDQ DX, AX
-
-	// Right now BX has len(b)-32, and we want to loop until SI > len(b)-8.
-	ADDQ $24, BX
-
-	CMPQ SI, BX
-	JG   fourByte
-
-wordLoop:
-	// Calculate k1.
-	MOVQ  (SI), R8
-	ADDQ  $8, SI
-	IMULQ R14, R8
-	ROLQ  $31, R8
-	IMULQ R13, R8
-
-	XORQ  R8, AX
-	ROLQ  $27, AX
-	IMULQ R13, AX
-	ADDQ  DI, AX
-
-	CMPQ SI, BX
-	JLE  wordLoop
-
-fourByte:
-	ADDQ $4, BX
-	CMPQ SI, BX
-	JG   singles
-
-	MOVL  (SI), R8
-	ADDQ  $4, SI
-	IMULQ R13, R8
-	XORQ  R8, AX
-
-	ROLQ  $23, AX
-	IMULQ R14, AX
-	ADDQ  ·prime3v(SB), AX
-
-singles:
-	ADDQ $4, BX
-	CMPQ SI, BX
+	ADDQ n, h
+
+	ADDQ $24, end
+	CMPQ p, end
+	JG   try4
+
+loop8:
+	MOVQ  (p), x
+	ADDQ  $8, p
+	round0(x)
+	XORQ  x, h
+	ROLQ  $27, h
+	IMULQ prime1, h
+	ADDQ  prime4, h
+
+	CMPQ p, end
+	JLE  loop8
+
+try4:
+	ADDQ $4, end
+	CMPQ p, end
+	JG   try1
+
+	MOVL  (p), x
+	ADDQ  $4, p
+	IMULQ prime1, x
+	XORQ  x, h
+
+	ROLQ  $23, h
+	IMULQ prime2, h
+	ADDQ  ·primes+16(SB), h
+
+try1:
+	ADDQ $4, end
+	CMPQ p, end
 	JGE  finalize
 
-singlesLoop:
-	MOVBQZX (SI), R12
-	ADDQ    $1, SI
-	IMULQ   ·prime5v(SB), R12
-	XORQ    R12, AX
+loop1:
+	MOVBQZX (p), x
+	ADDQ    $1, p
+	IMULQ   ·primes+32(SB), x
+	XORQ    x, h
+	ROLQ    $11, h
+	IMULQ   prime1, h
 
-	ROLQ  $11, AX
-	IMULQ R13, AX
-
-	CMPQ SI, BX
-	JL   singlesLoop
+	CMPQ p, end
+	JL   loop1
 
 finalize:
-	MOVQ  AX, R12
-	SHRQ  $33, R12
-	XORQ  R12, AX
-	IMULQ R14, AX
-	MOVQ  AX, R12
-	SHRQ  $29, R12
-	XORQ  R12, AX
-	IMULQ ·prime3v(SB), AX
-	MOVQ  AX, R12
-	SHRQ  $32, R12
-	XORQ  R12, AX
-
-	MOVQ AX, ret+24(FP)
+	MOVQ  h, x
+	SHRQ  $33, x
+	XORQ  x, h
+	IMULQ prime2, h
+	MOVQ  h, x
+	SHRQ  $29, x
+	XORQ  x, h
+	IMULQ ·primes+16(SB), h
+	MOVQ  h, x
+	SHRQ  $32, x
+	XORQ  x, h
+
+	MOVQ h, ret+24(FP)
 	RET
 
-// writeBlocks uses the same registers as above except that it uses AX to store
-// the d pointer.
-
 // func writeBlocks(d *Digest, b []byte) int
-TEXT ·writeBlocks(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-40
+TEXT ·writeBlocks(SB), NOSPLIT|NOFRAME, $0-40
 	// Load fixed primes needed for round.
-	MOVQ ·prime1v(SB), R13
-	MOVQ ·prime2v(SB), R14
+	MOVQ ·primes+0(SB), prime1
+	MOVQ ·primes+8(SB), prime2
 
 	// Load slice.
-	MOVQ b_base+8(FP), SI
-	MOVQ b_len+16(FP), DX
-	LEAQ (SI)(DX*1), BX
-	SUBQ $32, BX
+	MOVQ b_base+8(FP), p
+	MOVQ b_len+16(FP), n
+	LEAQ (p)(n*1), end
+	SUBQ $32, end
 
 	// Load vN from d.
-	MOVQ d+0(FP), AX
-	MOVQ 0(AX), R8   // v1
-	MOVQ 8(AX), R9   // v2
-	MOVQ 16(AX), R10 // v3
-	MOVQ 24(AX), R11 // v4
+	MOVQ s+0(FP), d
+	MOVQ 0(d), v1
+	MOVQ 8(d), v2
+	MOVQ 16(d), v3
+	MOVQ 24(d), v4
 
 	// We don't need to check the loop condition here; this function is
 	// always called with at least one block of data to process.
-blockLoop:
-	round(R8)
-	round(R9)
-	round(R10)
-	round(R11)
-
-	CMPQ SI, BX
-	JLE  blockLoop
+	blockLoop()
 
 	// Copy vN back to d.
-	MOVQ R8, 0(AX)
-	MOVQ R9, 8(AX)
-	MOVQ R10, 16(AX)
-	MOVQ R11, 24(AX)
-
-	// The number of bytes written is SI minus the old base pointer.
-	SUBQ b_base+8(FP), SI
-	MOVQ SI, ret+32(FP)
+	MOVQ v1, 0(d)
+	MOVQ v2, 8(d)
+	MOVQ v3, 16(d)
+	MOVQ v4, 24(d)
+
+	// The number of bytes written is p minus the old base pointer.
+	SUBQ b_base+8(FP), p
+	MOVQ p, ret+32(FP)
 
 	RET

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_arm64.s

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+//go:build !appengine && gc && !purego
+// +build !appengine
+// +build gc
+// +build !purego
+
+#include "textflag.h"
+
+// Registers:
+#define digest	R1
+#define h	R2 // return value
+#define p	R3 // input pointer
+#define n	R4 // input length
+#define nblocks	R5 // n / 32
+#define prime1	R7
+#define prime2	R8
+#define prime3	R9
+#define prime4	R10
+#define prime5	R11
+#define v1	R12
+#define v2	R13
+#define v3	R14
+#define v4	R15
+#define x1	R20
+#define x2	R21
+#define x3	R22
+#define x4	R23
+
+#define round(acc, x) \
+	MADD prime2, acc, x, acc \
+	ROR  $64-31, acc         \
+	MUL  prime1, acc
+
+// round0 performs the operation x = round(0, x).
+#define round0(x) \
+	MUL prime2, x \
+	ROR $64-31, x \
+	MUL prime1, x
+
+#define mergeRound(acc, x) \
+	round0(x)                     \
+	EOR  x, acc                   \
+	MADD acc, prime4, prime1, acc
+
+// blockLoop processes as many 32-byte blocks as possible,
+// updating v1, v2, v3, and v4. It assumes that n >= 32.
+#define blockLoop() \
+	LSR     $5, n, nblocks  \
+	PCALIGN $16             \
+	loop:                   \
+	LDP.P   16(p), (x1, x2) \
+	LDP.P   16(p), (x3, x4) \
+	round(v1, x1)           \
+	round(v2, x2)           \
+	round(v3, x3)           \
+	round(v4, x4)           \
+	SUB     $1, nblocks     \
+	CBNZ    nblocks, loop
+
+// func Sum64(b []byte) uint64
+TEXT ·Sum64(SB), NOSPLIT|NOFRAME, $0-32
+	LDP b_base+0(FP), (p, n)
+
+	LDP  ·primes+0(SB), (prime1, prime2)
+	LDP  ·primes+16(SB), (prime3, prime4)
+	MOVD ·primes+32(SB), prime5
+
+	CMP  $32, n
+	CSEL LT, prime5, ZR, h // if n < 32 { h = prime5 } else { h = 0 }
+	BLT  afterLoop
+
+	ADD  prime1, prime2, v1
+	MOVD prime2, v2
+	MOVD $0, v3
+	NEG  prime1, v4
+
+	blockLoop()
+
+	ROR $64-1, v1, x1
+	ROR $64-7, v2, x2
+	ADD x1, x2
+	ROR $64-12, v3, x3
+	ROR $64-18, v4, x4
+	ADD x3, x4
+	ADD x2, x4, h
+
+	mergeRound(h, v1)
+	mergeRound(h, v2)
+	mergeRound(h, v3)
+	mergeRound(h, v4)
+
+afterLoop:
+	ADD n, h
+
+	TBZ   $4, n, try8
+	LDP.P 16(p), (x1, x2)
+
+	round0(x1)
+
+	// NOTE: here and below, sequencing the EOR after the ROR (using a
+	// rotated register) is worth a small but measurable speedup for small
+	// inputs.
+	ROR  $64-27, h
+	EOR  x1 @> 64-27, h, h
+	MADD h, prime4, prime1, h
+
+	round0(x2)
+	ROR  $64-27, h
+	EOR  x2 @> 64-27, h, h
+	MADD h, prime4, prime1, h
+
+try8:
+	TBZ    $3, n, try4
+	MOVD.P 8(p), x1
+
+	round0(x1)
+	ROR  $64-27, h
+	EOR  x1 @> 64-27, h, h
+	MADD h, prime4, prime1, h
+
+try4:
+	TBZ     $2, n, try2
+	MOVWU.P 4(p), x2
+
+	MUL  prime1, x2
+	ROR  $64-23, h
+	EOR  x2 @> 64-23, h, h
+	MADD h, prime3, prime2, h
+
+try2:
+	TBZ     $1, n, try1
+	MOVHU.P 2(p), x3
+	AND     $255, x3, x1
+	LSR     $8, x3, x2
+
+	MUL prime5, x1
+	ROR $64-11, h
+	EOR x1 @> 64-11, h, h
+	MUL prime1, h
+
+	MUL prime5, x2
+	ROR $64-11, h
+	EOR x2 @> 64-11, h, h
+	MUL prime1, h
+
+try1:
+	TBZ   $0, n, finalize
+	MOVBU (p), x4
+
+	MUL prime5, x4
+	ROR $64-11, h
+	EOR x4 @> 64-11, h, h
+	MUL prime1, h
+
+finalize:
+	EOR h >> 33, h
+	MUL prime2, h
+	EOR h >> 29, h
+	MUL prime3, h
+	EOR h >> 32, h
+
+	MOVD h, ret+24(FP)
+	RET
+
+// func writeBlocks(d *Digest, b []byte) int
+TEXT ·writeBlocks(SB), NOSPLIT|NOFRAME, $0-40
+	LDP ·primes+0(SB), (prime1, prime2)
+
+	// Load state. Assume v[1-4] are stored contiguously.
+	MOVD d+0(FP), digest
+	LDP  0(digest), (v1, v2)
+	LDP  16(digest), (v3, v4)
+
+	LDP b_base+8(FP), (p, n)
+
+	blockLoop()
+
+	// Store updated state.
+	STP (v1, v2), 0(digest)
+	STP (v3, v4), 16(digest)
+
+	BIC  $31, n
+	MOVD n, ret+32(FP)
+	RET

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_amd64.go → vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_asm.go

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+//go:build (amd64 || arm64) && !appengine && gc && !purego
+// +build amd64 arm64
 // +build !appengine
 // +build gc
 // +build !purego

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_other.go

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-// +build !amd64 appengine !gc purego
+//go:build (!amd64 && !arm64) || appengine || !gc || purego
+// +build !amd64,!arm64 appengine !gc purego
 
 package xxhash
 
@@ -14,10 +15,10 @@ func Sum64(b []byte) uint64 {
 	var h uint64
 
 	if n >= 32 {
-		v1 := prime1v + prime2
+		v1 := primes[0] + prime2
 		v2 := prime2
 		v3 := uint64(0)
-		v4 := -prime1v
+		v4 := -primes[0]
 		for len(b) >= 32 {
 			v1 = round(v1, u64(b[0:8:len(b)]))
 			v2 = round(v2, u64(b[8:16:len(b)]))
@@ -36,19 +37,18 @@ func Sum64(b []byte) uint64 {
 
 	h += uint64(n)
 
-	i, end := 0, len(b)
-	for ; i+8 <= end; i += 8 {
-		k1 := round(0, u64(b[i:i+8:len(b)]))
+	for ; len(b) >= 8; b = b[8:] {
+		k1 := round(0, u64(b[:8]))
 		h ^= k1
 		h = rol27(h)*prime1 + prime4
 	}
-	if i+4 <= end {
-		h ^= uint64(u32(b[i:i+4:len(b)])) * prime1
+	if len(b) >= 4 {
+		h ^= uint64(u32(b[:4])) * prime1
 		h = rol23(h)*prime2 + prime3
-		i += 4
+		b = b[4:]
 	}
-	for ; i < end; i++ {
-		h ^= uint64(b[i]) * prime5
+	for ; len(b) > 0; b = b[1:] {
+		h ^= uint64(b[0]) * prime5
 		h = rol11(h) * prime1
 	}
 

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_safe.go

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+//go:build appengine
 // +build appengine
 
 // This file contains the safe implementations of otherwise unsafe-using code.

vendor/github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2/xxhash_unsafe.go

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+//go:build !appengine
 // +build !appengine
 
 // This file encapsulates usage of unsafe.
@@ -11,7 +12,7 @@ import (
 
 // In the future it's possible that compiler optimizations will make these
 // XxxString functions unnecessary by realizing that calls such as
-// Sum64([]byte(s)) don't need to copy s. See https://golang.org/issue/2205.
+// Sum64([]byte(s)) don't need to copy s. See https://go.dev/issue/2205.
 // If that happens, even if we keep these functions they can be replaced with
 // the trivial safe code.
 

vendor/modules.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2 v2.1.2
+# github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2 v2.2.0
 ## explicit; go 1.11
 github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2
 # github.com/dgryski/go-rendezvous v0.0.0-20200823014737-9f7001d12a5f